Filtered (55)
Filters
Search
Type
Categories
Show (55)
Cancel
New Australian Law will Mandate Age Checks, Data Deletion for Social Media Platforms

Children as data subjects

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau WASHINGTON, D.C

Finance and Fintech

Slovenian SA Decision 0603-42/2023/12 against Dodo Pizza

CCTV, Lawfulness of Processing, Legitimate Interest

Age-Appropriate Design Toolkit Tracker

Children as data subjects

Age Appropriate Design Toolkit Tracker- more information about the Toolkit by UK ICO

Children as data subjects

Supreme Court of Singapore’s Circular on the Use of GenAI Tools in Court Documents

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

EDPS Model Administrative Arrangement

Data Processing by the Government, Data Transfers, Specific processing situations

Statement 2/2024 on the financial data access and payments package by EDPB

Finance and Fintech

Recommendations 02/2020 on the European Essential Guarantees for surveillance measures

CCTV, Lawfulness of Processing, Legitimate Interest, Specific processing situations

Opinion on processing of CCTV data in regard to employee performance analytics by the Bulgarian DPA

CCTV, Employment, Specific processing situations

Guidance on the Use of CCTV – For Data Controllers by the Irish DPC

CCTV, Specific processing situations

Child oriented approach to data processing by DPC Ireland

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Bulgarian CPPD Newsletter

Children as data subjects, Controllers and Processors, Data Subjects Rights, Technical and Organisational Measures (TOMs)

Government access to datain third countries

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Recommendations 1-2022 on the Application for Approval and on the elements and principles to be found in Controller Binding Corporate Rules (Art. 47 GDPR)

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

C-708/18

CCTV, Lawfulness of Processing, Legitimate Interest, Specific processing situations

Recommendation 5: Promote parental controls that respect the child’s privacy and best interests by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Recommendation 4: Seek parental consent for children under 15 by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Consent, Data Subjects Rights, Lawfulness of Processing

Recommendation 3: Support parents with digital education by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Recommendation 2: Encourage children to exercise their rights by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Recommendation 1: Regulate the capacity of children to act online by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Demonstration of a privacy-preserving age verification process by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Online age verification: balancing privacy and the protection of minors by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Online age verification: balancing privacy and the protection of minors by CNIL | French

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Recommendation 7: Check the age of the child and parental consent while respecting the child’s privacy by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Recommendation 6: Strengthen the information and rights of children by design by CNIL

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Noyb Complaint Case: C-082-01 to EU Data protection Supervisor against EU Parliament

Controllers and Processors, Data Breaches, Public Administrative Body

GDPR in practice – Experiences of data protection authorities by FRA

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Noyb Complaint Case: C-082-02 to EU Data protection Supervisor against EU Parliament

Controllers and Processors, Data Breaches, Public Administrative Body

Policy for the responsible use of AI in government by Australian Government

AI, Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Data protection code of practice for digital identity schemes in Afrtica

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Principles on Children & Online Gaming Adopted at the Nordic Data Protection Meeting in Oslo 30 May 2024

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

GDPR in practice: Experience of data protection authorities by FRA

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Opinion 23/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Czech Republic regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 24/2021 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovakia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 16/2021 on the draft decision of the Belgian Supervisory Authority regarding the “EU Data Protection Code of Conduct for Cloud Service Providers” submitted by Scope Europe |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 17/2021 on the draft decision of the French Supervisory Authority regarding the European code of conduct submitted by the Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers (CISPE) |EDPB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 14/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Bulgaria regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 15/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Luxembourg regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 16/2022 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Slovenia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 04/2022 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse

Children as data subjects, Data Subjects Rights

Opinion 1/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Croatia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 02/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Latvia regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to Article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

Opinion 03/2023 on the draft decision of the competent supervisory authority of Romania regarding the approval of the requirements for accreditation of a code of conduct monitoring body pursuant to article 41 GDPR |EPDB

Code of Conduct, Controllers and Processors

František Ryneš v. Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů [2014] Case C-212/13, 11 December 2014

CCTV

Children and the GDPR | UK ICO

Children as data subjects

Guidance on Video Surveillance | UK ICO

CCTV

Members of the Code of Conduct for Cloud Infrastructure Service Providers

Code of Conduct

Guidelines 1/2019 on Codes of Conduct and Monitoring Bodies under Regulation 2016/679

Code of Conduct

Guidelines 3/2019 on processing of personal data through video devices

CCTV

Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC): Corporate Plan for 2024-25

Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

The government-wide vision on Generative Al of the Netherlands

AI, Data Processing by the Government, Specific processing situations

Statement 2/2024 on the financial data access and payments package bg EDPB

Finance and Fintech

A 10-step guide to sharing information to safeguard children by the UK ICO

Children as data subjects

ANAF Case C‑201/14, 1 October 2015

Automated Decision-making, Data Sharing, Data Transfers, Public Administrative Body