Details:
| Summary | The fine was imposed in relation to a data subject’s request for data correction and erasure. NAIH levied a fine against an unnamed financial institution for unlawfully rejecting a customer’s request to have his phone number erased after arguing that it was in the company’s legitimate interest to process this data in order to enforce a debt claim against the customer. In its decision, the NAIH emphasised that the customer’s phone number is not necessary for the purpose of debt collection because the creditor can also communicate with the debtor by post. Consequently, keeping the phone number of the debtor was against the principles of data minimisation and purpose limitation. As per the law, the assessed fine was based on 0.025% of the company’s annual net revenue. |
| Link: | link link |
| Related articles: | Art. 5 (1) b) GDPR, Art. 5 (1) c) GDPR, Art. 13 (3) GDPR, Art. 17 (1) GDPR, Art. 6 (4) GDPR |
| Type: | Insufficient fulfilment of data subjects rights |
| Fine: | EUR 3,200 |
| Sector | Finance, Insurance and Consulting |
All data is based on The CMS’s Law GDPR Enforcement Tracker Source: https://www.enforcementtracker.com/